I know that many people think that there is free traffic and paid traffic.

The reality is that you pay for all of your traffic.

You either pay with cash and get guaranteed visitors or clicks, or you pay for it with sweat equity.

The cash way is faster and more reliable, but unless you have your funnel set up correctly, it can be expensive.

What do I mean by correctly?

When you have set up your funnel correctly, you will make a positive return on investment.

Think about it this way, if I was to exchange every $5 you give me with $10, how much money would you give me?

This is not an offer, by the way, so don't send me any money.

If you could make $10 for every $5 spent you'd throw money at it all day long, wouldn't you?

Absolutely you would.

When you have your funnel set up correctly, that is what happens with paid traffic.

Unfortunately, this is not the same when setting up SEO and backlinks on a website.

There are no guarantees that you'll even attract the right sort of traffic or that you'll get sufficient numbers to be able to fine-tune your funnel.

But, the dollar cost of the traffic is small, so the ROI doesn't have to be much for it to be positive.

I like paying for traffic as I don't have to spend a lot of time fussing over SEO or backlinks, but not everyone agrees with me.

What do you think?

What's your preferred traffic method?

Regards,

Brent.

P.S. One of the proponents of paid traffic is Wayne Crowe.

He has built a substantial business by buying traffic for many years and now teaches other people how to do that.

He also sells clicks to others with guarantees of results.

That is frankly unheard of with other solo ad vendors.

Can you believe that?

Guaranteed results.

By results, he means sales, not just sign-ups.

You can start to learn his secrets by joining his free Facebook page and then going through the free training.

Worth a look.

You're getting this email because you signed up on my
website or bought something from me.

Unsubscribe here