|
I read that the New York Times has said that 40% of their articles are written by AI software.
If they are all based on a template and the software only has to fill in some blanks then yes it could do that.
But, based on my observations and experimentation, none of the output from these tools is any better than good quality spun content.
Have you seen better quality articles from AI software?
As with spun content or PLR articles, you still have to rewrite it.
If you have to rewrite it extensively then it’s nearly easier to write it completely from scratch.
The only advantage is that you can have a base to start with rather than creating that as well.
So, if the AI tools are only good for ideas as a base for your articles then there is no advantage over PLR or pulling an article from a directory.
Other places to get ideas for your articles are places like Buzzfeed, Google alerts, any RSS feeds that you can find, forum posts, Q & A sites etc.
Remember that ideas can’t be copyright but the post, article, book, report and any other content can be.
This means that you can rewrite anything in your own words but you can’t use it verbatim.
This is not to say that you only need to change some words or phrases, no, you need to completely rewrite it.
Often it’s easier to read several pieces of content and then write your own from what you learned without referencing the material you wrote.
Easy peasy.
Regards,
Brent
P.S. To help you out with some decent content to use as the base for your own content here is something you should find useful.
Alice creates excellent PLR, I use it for courses, blog posts etc.
Much of what is called PLR is utter crap and you couldn't even light a decent fire with it.
Alice's content is not like that, you could use it as it comes but, as always, you're better off using it as the base for what you end up with.
You'll find out more about it here. |